The education system in the United States faces massive challenges — challenges that are constantly redefined by a rapidly changing environment.

Leaders and innovators in education need to do more than address falling test scores, crumbling facilities and a mounting teacher shortage; they need to address those problems in a world transformed by everything from advanced biotechnology to climate refugees.

Grantmakers for Education (GFE), a network of approximately 260 education funders, is working to build a common definition of innovation and to identify investments that can transform our education systems. As part of this initiative, educational innovation specialists from Collective Invention and KnowledgeWorks collaborated with GFE to design and document programs that enable grantmakers to step back from their typical funding procedures and consider what innovations can leverage the most change for learners.

The team utilized expertise in user-centric design thinking. Their process centered around a set of personas designed to help funders understand the how the education system will intersect with emerging global trends.

Meet the Learners of 2025

Imagine that you are Adila Tahawi a 15-year old first generation Arab-American from Minneapolis. Your father is teacher at an underfunded university, he makes ends meet by selling lectures and tutoring online.

You are home-schooled by your mother using a mix of e-learning content and in-person tutoring. You dream of one day going to college, or somewhere rich in intellectual collaboration and innovation, and you struggle daily with anti-Muslim sentiments in your community.

What resources do you need? What kind of education system is capable of providing you with those resources? What can funders do today to ensure that those resources are in place?

Imagine that you are JP Teaero, a 17-year old climate refugee from Kiribati living at a camp in Richmond, CA. NGOs have set up a makeshift education facility in your camp, but your elders are worried about the school assimilating away your already-fragile cultural heritage.

You are interested in pursuing climate science, a skill in growing demand, but are afraid that a refugee won’t be able to become, or be respected as, a scientist. A Federal grant has made first-generation cognitive implants available in your camp, and you are unsure whether to take the risk.

What resources do you need? What kind of education system is capable of providing you with those resources? What can funders do today to ensure that those resources are in place?

The Art of the Uncertain Future

By utilizing systems thinking and scenario planning methodologies, Collective invention and Knowledgeworks were able to lead discussion on how relatively certain trends (such as the existence of climate refugees) interact with trends that have axes of uncertainty (such as the widespread availability of on-demand educational content.) The result was a sophisticated dialogue about how the nation’s top funders can meet the emerging challenges of tomorrow.

The exercise brought a stream of insights. Grantmakers focused on the “need to be more nimble and less bureaucratic,” and to “listen on the ground from many perspectives.” Looking to the future also put the need for educational innovation in sharp focus. Grantmakers discussed creating a “education innovation labs and and venture funds,” while convening “business, funders, systems engineers, product managers, students and designers in… a product development cycle.”

A New Direction for Educational Grantmakers

In the end of the exercise, grantmakers determined that they would be successful in 2025 if…

1. We have fostered public will for new kinds of learning and new learning outcomes.
2. We have advocated policy that enables new kinds of learning and new learning outcomes.
3. We have innovated funding mechanisms to enable greater choice, equity, and/or new learning models.
4. We have identified new forms of governance.
5. We have fostered personalized learning in a community context.
6. We have defined new critical skills and knowledge.
7. We have prototyped and/or scaled new models for learning.
8. We have delivered on the promise of digital media.
9. We have reimagined assessments for (and of) learning.
10. We have framed a research agenda for a new world for learning.

Two new briefs offer further insight into these efforts. Innovation in Education: Redesigning the Delivery System of Education in America documents how funders at GFE’s April 2010 member briefing used three key approaches—systems thinking, design thinking and scenario thinking—to understand what grantmakers can do to transform education systems. Learning 2025 summarizes themes from a working meeting in which a small group of funders mapped their investments in next generation learning strategies.